HOAs: Follow Your Bylaws & Proper Parliamentary Procedure
We are regularly asked by association clients if it really matters how precisely meeting rules are followed. “Can’t we just vote on this proposal by e-mail?” “What’s the consequence if the meeting notice is not exactly right?” Without exception, our advice is always: FOLLOW THE RULES.
As an example of “what can happen?” comes the North Carolina appellate case of Willomere Community Association, Inc. and Nottingham Owners Association, Inc. v. City of Charlotte and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership, Inc. (November 1, 2016). The moral of the story is that procedural rules for meetings and voting when making decisions should be followed very carefully.
In Willomere, a rezoning of property next to a community association was approved and two associations filed a lawsuit challenging the rezoning. The appeal doesn’t actually involve the substance of the rezoning, but the procedural process by which the lawsuits were initiated. The NC Court of Appeals determined that both associations “failed to follow the requirements in their respective bylaws with regard to their decision to initiate this litigation,” which means the lawsuits were invalid.
One association admitted the decision to initiate the lawsuit was not taken at a formal meeting with a vote but was decided by e-mail. While the Court noted the possibility that e-mail evidence would prove there was written unanimous consent of every director, which is permitted, the record before the Court simply did not show that such action was taken. As a result, the association’s decision to initiate litigation was improper.
The second association argued that its board authorized litigation during a telephone conversation. However, the testimony showed that the telephone discussion was not an officially noticed board meeting by teleconference with an official vote, but simply a phone “conversation.” The Court noted there was no proper notice of the “meeting,” there were no minutes of actions taken during the “meeting,” etc. As a result, the association’s decision to initiate litigation was improper.
Because the association boards didn’t follow their own bylaws (and state statutes) in making the decision to file the lawsuit, the Court held that the associations lacked “standing” to bring the actions, and the lawsuit was dismissed.
At times, it may seem that we as attorneys constantly nag about doing everything by the book and watching the details, whether that’s due to a specific state statute or Robert’s Rules of Order (also required generally by state statute). This case is a keen reminder that when it comes to board meetings and making formal decisions, do it right the first time.
Keep in mind that this was a North Carolina case that applies to North Carolina only, and because North Carolina and South Carolina statutes and documents vary, you can’t assume that what works in one state will work in the other. If you have specific questions about board meetings or how to make proper board decisions, feel free to give our firm a call. I’m proud to say we’re the only law firm in the country with two attorneys who are Professional Registered Parliamentarians (PRPs) with the National Association of Parliamentarians.
Article posted in HOA & Condo Associations, Parliamentary Law by Jim Slaughter. November 2, 2016
You can learn more about Parliamentary Procedure by visiting your Board Member Toolbox.
Search Posts
Recent Posts
- CAMS' Regional VP Jeanmare Holjencin Earns AMS Designation
- CAMS' Jenny Pratt Earns CMCA Designation
- Nine Reasons Partner Banks Benefit CAMS’ Clients
- CAMS' Heather Ziranski Earns Association Management Specialist Designation
- Janine Entwistle Earns Prestigious Professional Manager of Community Associations Designation
- Todd Edmiston Celebrates 25 Years of Dedicated Service at CAMS
- Are you Following Robert's Rules at Your Community Association Meetings?
- CAMS Lori Sistare Earns Association Management Specialist Designation
- CAMS' Nicole Gugel Earns CMCA Designation
- Term Expirations & Board Resignations: What Your Association Must Know
Did you know?
Most Neighbors maintain that the biggest benefit of their association is preserving the value and integrity of their individual investment. learn more >
Kudos From Clients
What people are saying about us on Google
Questions?
General Inquiries
877-672-2267Already a Customer?
Choose one of these options:
Maintenance | General Inquiries
Emergencies Only
We provide emergency service for extreme property damage 24-hours a day, 7 days a week. Call 877-672-2267 and follow the prompts for the emergency line and leave a detailed message for a call back.
All true emergencies threatening severe property loss will be contacted within 15 minutes. All other non-emergency calls will be returned the following business day. Please contact 911 for extreme emergencies threatening life or property.
Get the Scoop
Stay informed with HOA tips and information.